|
|
|
We urge anyone who believes regulation is not fit for
purpose to get involved so if you are regulated by the FSA we
need to get together and sort them out. Join us today application
form bank
mandate .
Coming soon Financial Services Defence Union at www.fs-du.co.uk
Judge declares FOS case fee rule
'unfair in principle and in practice' HERE
Submission
to House of Lords Select Committee on Regulators - Call for
evidence - UK Economic Regulators (Copyright)
Their report is HERE
FOI0002 ICO Decision notice HERE
The FSA tried to use Articles 6 and 8 of the ECHR to defend
the life offices, what a cheek! And where is the evidence that
they ALL put things as they should be?
STRAIGHT and CroOKed THINKING
-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Mansell
Sent: 02 August 2007 12:45
To:
Subject: Looks like the FSA has been caught out
FSA Dan Waters doesn't like pressure from Brussels! CLICK
HERE
IFA's don't like the threat of annihilation at the hands of
the FSA RDR!
But the real issue could be that the EU is the boss and
says that RDR does not apply to MIFID
advisers!
Here is what the EU said to me CLICK
HERE. Judge for yourself - seems to contradict what
the FSA is telling everyone! No wonder they are upset they
have been caught with their regulatory
pants down.
Here is the MM article that is published today - watch this
space because its got the FSA back up!
"Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?",
Who guards the guards? Satire VI
Who regulates the regulators
Best regards
Simon Mansell
...The word is independence. There are many definitions but
let's take a look at three:
1. Not influenced or controlled by others in matters of
opinion, conduct, etc.; thinking or acting for oneself: an
independent thinker.
2. Not subject to another's authority or jurisdiction;
autonomous; free: an independent businessman.
3. Expressive of a spirit of independence;
self-confident; unconstrained: a free and independent
citizen.
Long live IFAs
whatever method of payment their clients choose
Evidently
in response to articles including THIS
ONE
Sir Christopher Kelly, chairman of the Financial Ombudsman
Service gave a speech at the Association
of Finance Brokers (AFB) annual dinner on 2 July 2007. Our response is HERE
FSA mystery (PDF)
Freedom
of Information: Right to Know Request
FOI0001
Sight of Counsel's opinions on the compatibility of the FSMA
2000 with the Human Rights Act 1998. There are no favourable
Counsel's opinions and according to insiders Gordon Brown
couldn't be bothered to obtain one to support his
certification of the FSMA Bill, that's arrogance for you. Can
he be dragged before Parliament to explain why he deceived the
whole House? He did the same with the Finance Bill. He should
be sacked! The whole Government runs on lies and spin...
FOI0002
How many providers used 'inappropriate charges' to set
premiums i.e LAUTRO 'assumed expenses'? To date we haven't
found one single provider who actually used own charges to set
the premium, can anyone out there put the record straight?
There is a case for providers to come clean after
leaving IFAs (and PI insurers) in the lurch. Every single life
office product sold between April 1988 and January 1995
was misrepresented. ICO Decision notice HERE
FOI0003
How many IFAs were found to be fully compliant after visits
from FSA pension review teams? If the FSA visited 600 firms
out of 20,000 to review the sale of pensions what
criteria did they use? We have a number of firms who were
forced to spend a fortune on reviews that proved they were in
the clear.
FOI0026
Minutes of meetings and documentation relating to the
imposition of new time-bars effective 1st June 2004. If this
isn't in contravention of the Human Rights Act 1998 then what
is? (over 3.8MB)
FOI0027
Did FSA decide that IFAs could not rely on provider
literature? They say they don't have much faith in the
literature providers produce. They say a lot more than that to
AIFA who seem to have filed it under 'B'.
WHAT
FREEDOM?
ENDOWMENT
QUESTIONNAIRE
Letter
to ECPG and Impact
of regulation on retail financial services
"Most
regulators’ careers end prematurely in failure and
disgrace." - HOWARD DAVIES : HENRY THORNTON
LECTURE : CITY UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL : 4 NOVEMBER 1998
Letter from FSA
regarding 15 year long stop HERE
Hirst Opinion on FOS requirement to take account of what the
'former scheme' was required to do HERE
Open letter from
Terence O'Halloran to FSA
FOSSY
LOGIC!! Page
1 (1MB) Page 2
(4MB) Page 3 (1MB)
Subscribe to Money
Management The original writing is HERE
(HTML) or HERE
(Word)
UNFAIR
AND UNREASONABLE
Endowments
meet their targets, what was all the fuss about? Reproduced
with the kind permission of the Evening Standard. Copyright:
Evening Standard 2006.
Split-cap
‘compensation’ going to those who made millions and HERE
LIMITATION
and ANOTHER
and ANOTHER (1)
(2)
Please take care with any
opinion because that is all it is.
Letter to John
McFall HERE - Guess
what - No reply
I believe
everything the Leviathan says HERE
PIA warned of PIA perils HERE
Robber baron HERE
Letter
from FSA HERE
confirming our worst fears, regulated persons and companies
have no rights under common law. The letter is supposed to
address the fears we expressed during this meeting:
Letter
to FT
BACK
TO THE FUTURE?
There
may be trouble ahead......
More EMAILS
FSAGate
FOS
Goes to Strasbourg
In
The City by 'Slicker' Page
1 Page 2
Reproduced by kind permission of PRIVATE Eye/Pressdram.
Copyright Pressdram 200[5] www.private-eye.co.uk
Email to John
Tiner HERE
False
Premises - Money Management
FSAGATE
- 'Mystery shopping' of the regulator - IFAs need to do more
of it
'Pensions
Review' finally over? RPC newsletter HERE
The IFA Defence
Union recommends the use of surveillance equipment when
dealing with the regulators or even clients, the following
story is that of another IFA who fell under the wheels
of this driverless juggernaut:
"Totally
endorse the recording of dealings with regulators
We were terminated by FIMBRA due to false allegations by a
couple of sick bully boys.
Almost by accident I had taken a micro recorder up (my
sister-in-law worked for an electronics firm). I had recorded
the conversation with the compliance officer at Hertsmere
House.
When we played back the recording it bore no resemblance to
the words we were alleged to have said and which were pivotal
to the case against us.
Our Solicitor let it be known that he had seen the transcript
of the tape, but no mention was made at our appeals tribunal.
Our Barrister did take the compliance officers apart and
showed them up for what they were..
There was an ex policemen that worked for the 2 compliance
officers that had taken a statement from us, at the hearing he
told the Tribunal that the written statement attributed to him
and used to bury us was not made by him (he at least was being
honest).
1) What would have happened if I didn't have the proof that
they were lying?
2) Why did they lie in the first place?
3) Why were they not disciplined for lying? (we couldn't
afford to take them to the High Court)
I am saddened by what happened, my Father thought naively
that if we just told the truth we would be alright. Just as
well that I am I bit more devious. I am still bitter for what
they did to my Family (unable to work for 3 months young
family to support and relying on state aid including milk
tokens) - I wonder whether Magee-Englefield and Hamp really
thought they had done a good job?
Thanks for all the support and help. (NO need to reply as
you are doing a great job into the nitty gritty)
Best Wishes
Yours Sincerely"
A Member
Targets of
'Mystery Shopping' we carry out on a regular basis include:
Ambulance Chasers, Regulators, Providers, Networks, National
IFAs, some really bent IFAs and some lying 'consumers'.
Dear
Mr Kenmir - Re: LAUTRO 'assumed expenses'
Dear
Lord Falconer - Re: Unnatural Justice
Depolarisation -
a shambles in the making
The Union is
the first port of call for advisers wherever they may be in
the UK and whatever area of business they have chosen to work
in. We welcome any person caught in the inhuman web of the
Financial Services and Markets Act, an Act that is not
compatible with the Human Rights Act 1998 so we will be
testing this soon, see THIS
and send it to YOUR MP as soon as possible, after
reading THIS
, THIS
FSA staff:
-
have been
caught with their pants down!
-
are wasting
time and money!
-
think they
are Civil Servants!
-
think they
don't need qualifications to be regulators!
-
are on a
mission against endowments!
FOS staff:
-
have no idea
what documentation was presented to clients before, during
and after a sale!
-
cannot tell
the difference between a KFD and a Schedule!
-
expect IFAs
to tell them what is within their jurisdiction even when
the IFA has six months to live and retired long before N2!
-
hound IFAs
for fees even though they are not due!
-
are on a
mission to create fee income!
Blair attacks
FSA - FSA attacks Blair - But ask yourself why the U turn, is
it something to do with an EU Commission investigation along
the lines of the detention of terror 'suspects'? Of course it
is, you can't keep declaring illegal bits of legislation as
being compatible with the Human Rights Act 1998 when everyone
knows it isn't.
Important legal
case HERE
The MENU System:
SCRAP IT! OR.. Let IFAs include the cost of
regulation so that clients see the full picture
IDD = 4 pages
Key Facts = 5 pages
Terms of Business = 4 pages
Menu = 6 pages
Illustration = three pages
Post Sale Cooling Off = God knows how may pages
“This paper by its very length defends itself against
the risk of being read.”
Winston Churchill
Tories
want to charge £50 for complaining
Opinion of
Anthony Speaight QC:
"There are growing concerns that the pendulum of
consumer protection has swung too far in the case of the
Financial Ombudsman Service and small independent financial
advisers. The FOS appears regularly to be exercising its
discretion to adjudicate upon claims against small IFAs up to
its maximum theoretical jurisdiction of £100,000. There is
rarely an oral hearing. And there are good reasons to believe
that sometimes FOS makes substantial awards in cases which
would be rejected by the courts. On other occasions
compensation seems to be calculated in a more generous manner
than a court would assess damages. By reason of very large
excesses and other insurance shortcomings some such IFAs have
no insurance which responds. There is no appeal on the merits.
Such a system would be tolerable if the maximum award were
modest – say
£5,000 (which is the maximum summary compensation under the
legal professions’ schemes for "inadequate professional
service"). It would also be tolerable if, as is the case
with the summary system of adjudication in the construction
industry under the Housing Grants Construction and
Regeneration Act 1996, there could be a complete rehearing
before a court. And it might even be tolerable if it were
applied only against very large companies
But an unappealable, compulsory, summary jurisdiction
against small traders making awards as great as £100,000 is,
in my view, both wrong in principle and producing injustice in
practice."
(No providers will be hurt in the making of this movie,
in fact they can join the cast.)
Limitation
of liability
Responses
to ABI Commission Consultation Document From REAL people
to UNREAL people
Analysis:
Under Review - FSA Enforcement Procedures
Leviathan
at large
Leviathan
still at large - Summary and Full
Letter
FSA
determined to give endowments a fair trial
Repayment
mortgages NOT
guaranteed to repay the loan - stunning revelation, not.
And HERE
and HERE
PENSIONS
REVIEW - WHAT A FARCE! Part
1 Part2 (.tif
files)
Then what
was said in Parliament
Re:
Article in Money Marketing entitled "IFAs seek legal
advice on misselling responsibility'. The quote in full was:
"the IFA Defence Union has been gathering opinions from
legal and actuarial experts as well as questioning the FSA.
The evidence strongly suggests that IFAs have a case for
misrepresentation of risk against providers with many products
but accept the argument that the regulator is culpable in some
areas and that the providers have a right to want to challenge
it. IFAs cannot be held responsible for misrepresentations
made by either party, they have been the whipping boy for far
too long. If IFAs are afraid of taking on the providers they
should ask themselves how much time and money they are wasting
on defending claims relating to 'unsuitable advice' when the
complaint is in fact about the product, the FSA have indicated
that it would be appropriate to refer such complaints to the
provider".
See: WRIT
OF MANDAMUS at LoveToKnow.
FSA warns of
high cost of small IFAs OUR
RESPONSE HERE
What
a week that was NEWS
Did
you know? - Commission costs an average of 3% within
investment business, compliance costs 9%... is the FSA adding
value? Considering it costs investors three times more than
the IFA distribution channel any sane person would come to the
conclusion that regulatory interference is counter
productive.
Financial
Risk Outlook 2005 - Another doorstop from the FSA with
the last three pages devoted to poor old IFAs
Complaint
to Callum McCarthy - FSA
Complaint
to Walter Merricks - FOS
ENDOWMENTS
- THE FACTS
Kafkaesque:
adjective in the style of, or reminiscent of, the ideas, work,
etc of the Czech novelist Franz Kafka (1883-1924), especially
in his vision of man's isolated existence in a dehumanized
world. Kafka's
trial as IFA 'ostrich' fights FSA
FSA
USES RESTITUTION ORDER Judge says Ombudsman acting
unfairly by not telling IFA he was entitled to an independent
oral hearing. Judge says roll up of pension reinstatement is
'extortion'. Judge refuses to take his home away. Judge
refuses to take all his money away. Judge refuses to accede to
all FSA requests. Judge refuses to include a false date
in the judgment.
Falconer
call to end claims culture: A Department for
Constitutional Affairs spokesman said: "This is a complex
and controversial issue where the Government cannot provide
all the solutions". OH YES IT CAN!! Here are the
simple solutions:
-
Follow the
lead of our astute Irish neighbours who require claimants
to sign an affidavit.
-
Penalise
those who tell lies.
-
Restore
some burden of proof to the complainant.
-
Charge the
complainant a fee that is refundable if successful.
-
Regulate
the 'clams handlers' - we have already reported a number
of IFAs who also have an 'unregulated' arm. How they can
claim to be 'unregulated' is in dispute when financial
advice is being provided.
Simple
solutions? Of course they are but why can't they be
implemented? Why is this so painful?
Also see: Complaints
and the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
OPINION
of ANTHONY SPEAIGHT QC on FSMA 2000 and COMPATIBILITY
with ECHR (STILL VALID)
http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm199899/cmbills/121/1999121.htm
EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer has made the following
statement under section 19(1)(a) of the Human Rights Act 1998:
In my view the provisions of the Financial Services and
Markets Bill are compatible with the Convention rights.
IMPEACH BROWN AS WELL?
www.impeachblair.org
The
Pensions Ombudsman and Article 6 of the European Convention on
Human rights HERE
If you
don't have the time or the inclination to read it here is a
brief synopsis : The FSMA is NOT compatible with the ECHR,
we have asked for sight of opinion. Also see HERE
IFADU
Response to FSA Consultation Paper 04/12
Your
Opportunity to respond using this document
Where
to respond to
Gary
Stidolph Response
Susan
King Response
APCIMS
N2+2
IMPORTANT
We need to hear from advisers who made written
representations to the regulators (FIMBRA, LAUTRO, SIB etc)
regarding pension transfers, opt-outs and non-joiners at any
time between 1988 and 1993.
Making
a fuss about the FOS This article is published in the
September 2004 issue of Money Management Magazine. To
subscribe call 020 8606 7545 or visit www.FTadviser.com
The only problem is a reference to primary legislation being
required to amend the FSMA and rein in those empowered by it
(in their own interpretation) when the fact is that the FSMA
allows just one of Her Majesty's Ministers to change
anything he/she wishes at any time and as often as he/she
deems fit. Well that's democracy? See HERE
We need copies of
FOS decision letters that advisers feel are incorrect so
please fax them to us on 0845 4585299, we will be compiling a
database that will be used to find inconsistencies. We have
quite a few interesting developments on this front, more to
follow.
FOS
Jurisdiction: It has been brought to our attention that
many IFAs are not aware of the full facts relating to the
jurisdiction of the FOS for any complaints relating to advice
provided before 1st December 2001.
 |
We can provide advice :
The regulatory climate is becoming more prescriptive
and the use of 100% hindsight by those in authority is
causing advice to be deemed inappropriate many years
after it was given in good faith, all advisers need
support from:
- Legal Experts
- Compliance Advisers
- PI insurance specialists
We have a list of people with experience of reversing
FOS decisions and success in appeals tribunals.
|
Many professions
have their own defence union:
Lawyers,
Accountants and Doctors have a union to turn to in times of
need. Now IFAs will have their very own defence union.
You may think IFAs
have no human rights and the authorities can do whatever they
like, this isn't so because many IFAs have been successfully
defended in the face of incorrect and uninformed FOS
decisions.
In the words of
Tony Blair
Source:
The Hutton debate
in Parliament and the following is quoted from Hansard,
Columns 770 and 771 on 4 February 2004 - the words are spoken
by the Prime Minister:
*I somehow feel
that I am not being entirely persuasive in certain quarters.
We cannot have a
situation in which we end up translating what we know today
back into the context of what was known and thought in
September 2002, and then reaching a judgment.*
Only
the regulatory system has 100% hindsight
The more corrupt
the State the more numerous the laws. -- Cornelius Tacitus
Click on the
'About' button to find out more and join our mailing list on
the links page.
http://www.qualifying-recognised-overseas-pension-scheme.com/
|
.jpg)
